Difficult: I thought that the most difficult part in this section was the part about associative functions. I think I understand the basics of the idea but I just thought it was difficult to get a clear understanding of the information simply by reading it.
Reflective: I liked reading the part about composition. I liked this section because I already understand the foundation of the principle after having taken calculus. Plus the idea is fairly simple and makes sense to me without having to go into too much detail.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Sunday, February 26, 2012
9.3-9.4, February 27
Difficult: The most difficult part of this reading would probably the part about identity functions in section 9.4. At first this concept seemed rather simply, but the more that I read about them, the more that I got confused. I understood the part in the section about bijective functions for the most part, however I am still a little unsure about all of the details on a surjective element. What are the similarities and differences between one-to-one and onto functions?
Reflective: I thought that the most simple concept to understand for this reading was one-to-one functions. I liked this part in the reading because I already have a foundation for this concept. After taking calculus and studying what entails something to be referred to as being one-to-one, it was rather simple to apply new terminology to the old idea. Although I think I understand the basics for onto functions, I'm not very confident with them.
Reflective: I thought that the most simple concept to understand for this reading was one-to-one functions. I liked this part in the reading because I already have a foundation for this concept. After taking calculus and studying what entails something to be referred to as being one-to-one, it was rather simple to apply new terminology to the old idea. Although I think I understand the basics for onto functions, I'm not very confident with them.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
9.1-9.2, due February 24
Difficult: The difficult section for this reading was 9.2. I just don't think i really understood most of it. I didn't understand what it meant by B^(A) and why that notation was chosen or what it really meant.
Reflexive: I enjoyed section 9.1 for this reading which was on functions, domains, codomains, ranges, images, and mapping. I felt like all of these terms were based of fundamental concepts that I already understand. However I don't think that I understood why for f: A > B that A is the domain and B is the codomain.
Reflexive: I enjoyed section 9.1 for this reading which was on functions, domains, codomains, ranges, images, and mapping. I felt like all of these terms were based of fundamental concepts that I already understand. However I don't think that I understood why for f: A > B that A is the domain and B is the codomain.
9.1-9.2, due February 24
Difficult: The difficult section for this reading was 9.2. I just don't think i really understood most of it. I didn't understand what it meant by B^(A) and why that notation was chosen or what it really meant.
Reflexive: I enjoyed section 9.1 for this reading which was on functions, domains, codomains, ranges, images, and mapping. I felt like all of these terms were based of fundamental concepts that I already understand. However I don't think that I understood why for f: A > B that A is the domain and B is the codomain.
Reflexive: I enjoyed section 9.1 for this reading which was on functions, domains, codomains, ranges, images, and mapping. I felt like all of these terms were based of fundamental concepts that I already understand. However I don't think that I understood why for f: A > B that A is the domain and B is the codomain.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
8.5-8.6, due on February 22
Difficult: For this reading I found section 8.6 more difficult to understand. This is probably partly because I still feel a little unsure of things when it comes to equivalence classes. This probably stems to the confusion regarding how equivalence classes relate to residue classes. I think that once I get more comfortable with equivalence classes though then this section will make more sense because I will have more of an understanding of the foundation for it.
Reflective: I thought that section 8.5 in this reading was very easy to understand. This is due to the fact that I have already learned the ideas and concepts behind the information that is given in section 8.5 regarding congruence when dividing and modulos. Then the section applies all of this information to relations, without really adding any new information.
Reflective: I thought that section 8.5 in this reading was very easy to understand. This is due to the fact that I have already learned the ideas and concepts behind the information that is given in section 8.5 regarding congruence when dividing and modulos. Then the section applies all of this information to relations, without really adding any new information.
Monday, February 20, 2012
8.3-8.4, due on February 21
Difficult: Although I found the idea about equivalence relations easy to understand, I got confused when the concept of an equivalence class was introduced. I don't understand what exactly it means for something to be categorized as an equivalence class and what makes it different from an equivalence relation.
Reflective: I thought that the concept in section 8.3 about equivalence relations was very simple to understand. Since we have already learned about the relation properties reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, I already had all of the main ideas of the concept and just needed to apply them in another way where all three are included in the definition.
Reflective: I thought that the concept in section 8.3 about equivalence relations was very simple to understand. Since we have already learned about the relation properties reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, I already had all of the main ideas of the concept and just needed to apply them in another way where all three are included in the definition.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
8.1-8.2, due February 17
Difficult: The most difficult section in this reading was 8.2. The beginning of this section was not difficult at all to understand regarding the properties of reflexive relations and symmetric relations. However, I thought that transitive relations were a little confusing. I'm not really sure what exactly it is referring to and what it means and then as a result helps us
Reflective: My favorite section in this reading was 8.1 about Relations. I liked this section best because it was easy to understand since I already know what it means for something to be a subset of A x B. So it was easy to understand the principle of relations because it is so closely related Cartesian products.
Reflective: My favorite section in this reading was 8.1 about Relations. I liked this section best because it was easy to understand since I already know what it means for something to be a subset of A x B. So it was easy to understand the principle of relations because it is so closely related Cartesian products.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)